<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Objective Nonsense (part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://societymatters.org/2010/02/06/objective-nonsense-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://societymatters.org/2010/02/06/objective-nonsense-part-1/</link>
	<description>How the National Geographic Society could create a new blueprint for journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Objective Nonsense (part 28) &#124; Society Matters</title>
		<link>http://societymatters.org/2010/02/06/objective-nonsense-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2832</link>
		<dc:creator>Objective Nonsense (part 28) &#124; Society Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://societymatters.org/?p=3554#comment-2832</guid>
		<description>[...] — NGM Editor Chris Johns [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] — NGM Editor Chris Johns [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Objective Nonsense (part 27) &#124; Society Matters</title>
		<link>http://societymatters.org/2010/02/06/objective-nonsense-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2786</link>
		<dc:creator>Objective Nonsense (part 27) &#124; Society Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://societymatters.org/?p=3554#comment-2786</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Johns’ claim that National Geographic has “no agenda”? It was part of an Editor’s Note in which Chris insisted that in “a world of shrill voices [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Johns’ claim that National Geographic has “no agenda”? It was part of an Editor’s Note in which Chris insisted that in “a world of shrill voices [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Objective Nonsense (part 26) &#124; Society Matters</title>
		<link>http://societymatters.org/2010/02/06/objective-nonsense-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2778</link>
		<dc:creator>Objective Nonsense (part 26) &#124; Society Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://societymatters.org/?p=3554#comment-2778</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Johns’ claim that National Geographic has “no agenda”? It was part of an Editor’s Note in which Chris insisted that in “a world of shrill voices [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Johns’ claim that National Geographic has “no agenda”? It was part of an Editor’s Note in which Chris insisted that in “a world of shrill voices [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our "unbiased" Society has a Pension Plan shortfall this year of approximately $23.8 million &#124; Society Matters</title>
		<link>http://societymatters.org/2010/02/06/objective-nonsense-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2631</link>
		<dc:creator>Our "unbiased" Society has a Pension Plan shortfall this year of approximately $23.8 million &#124; Society Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://societymatters.org/?p=3554#comment-2631</guid>
		<description>[...] Geographic magazine, Chris says, is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Geographic magazine, Chris says, is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Objective Nonsense (part 24) &#124; Society Matters</title>
		<link>http://societymatters.org/2010/02/06/objective-nonsense-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>Objective Nonsense (part 24) &#124; Society Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 00:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://societymatters.org/?p=3554#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>[...] Objective Nonsense series began 23 installments ago with Chris Johns describing a photo review at NGS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Objective Nonsense series began 23 installments ago with Chris Johns describing a photo review at NGS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closing the loop &#124; Society Matters</title>
		<link>http://societymatters.org/2010/02/06/objective-nonsense-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator>Closing the loop &#124; Society Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 16:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://societymatters.org/?p=3554#comment-2428</guid>
		<description>[...] it tougher to fundraise. (Rupert, again.)  • We&#8217;re pretending that our Society has &#8220;no agenda&#8221; — and that National Geographic has been agenda-free for &#8220;more than 120 years&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it tougher to fundraise. (Rupert, again.)  • We&#8217;re pretending that our Society has &#8220;no agenda&#8221; — and that National Geographic has been agenda-free for &#8220;more than 120 years&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Objective Nonsense (part 23) &#124; Society Matters</title>
		<link>http://societymatters.org/2010/02/06/objective-nonsense-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2322</link>
		<dc:creator>Objective Nonsense (part 23) &#124; Society Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 05:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://societymatters.org/?p=3554#comment-2322</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Johns says National Geographic has no agenda, and that it is &#8220;committed to an unbiased presentation of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Johns says National Geographic has no agenda, and that it is &#8220;committed to an unbiased presentation of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Objective Nonsense (part 22) &#124; Society Matters</title>
		<link>http://societymatters.org/2010/02/06/objective-nonsense-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2313</link>
		<dc:creator>Objective Nonsense (part 22) &#124; Society Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://societymatters.org/?p=3554#comment-2313</guid>
		<description>[...] “In a world full of shrill voices and agendas, we at National Geographic are committed to an unbiased presentation of facts…. It’s what we’ve been doing for more than 120 years.” — NGM Editor Chris Johns [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “In a world full of shrill voices and agendas, we at National Geographic are committed to an unbiased presentation of facts…. It’s what we’ve been doing for more than 120 years.” — NGM Editor Chris Johns [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Objective Nonsense (part 21) &#124; Society Matters</title>
		<link>http://societymatters.org/2010/02/06/objective-nonsense-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2289</link>
		<dc:creator>Objective Nonsense (part 21) &#124; Society Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://societymatters.org/?p=3554#comment-2289</guid>
		<description>[...] — NGM Editor Chris Johns [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] — NGM Editor Chris Johns [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autocrats R Us &#124; Society Matters</title>
		<link>http://societymatters.org/2010/02/06/objective-nonsense-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>Autocrats R Us &#124; Society Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 03:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://societymatters.org/?p=3554#comment-2288</guid>
		<description>[...] Johns: How can you insist that National Geographic is &#8220;unbiased&#8221; and has &#8220;no agenda&#8221; when one of our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Johns: How can you insist that National Geographic is &#8220;unbiased&#8221; and has &#8220;no agenda&#8221; when one of our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

