<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Over-extended?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://societymatters.org/2009/11/13/over-extended/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://societymatters.org/2009/11/13/over-extended/</link>
	<description>How the National Geographic Society could create a new blueprint for journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intra-marketing (part 2) &#124; Society Matters</title>
		<link>http://societymatters.org/2009/11/13/over-extended/comment-page-1/#comment-2687</link>
		<dc:creator>Intra-marketing (part 2) &#124; Society Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 00:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://societymatters.org/?p=3267#comment-2687</guid>
		<description>[...] — could create the foundation for a sustainable, independent Society that wouldn&#8217;t have to sell its soul to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] — could create the foundation for a sustainable, independent Society that wouldn&#8217;t have to sell its soul to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Community matters @ Magnum &#124; Society Matters</title>
		<link>http://societymatters.org/2009/11/13/over-extended/comment-page-1/#comment-2681</link>
		<dc:creator>Community matters @ Magnum &#124; Society Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://societymatters.org/?p=3267#comment-2681</guid>
		<description>[...] Could National Geographic pull off something similar? Or would people &#8220;balk at doing this&#8221; because our Society has become a &#8220;giant&#8221; with a much, um&#8230; broader focus. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Could National Geographic pull off something similar? Or would people &#8220;balk at doing this&#8221; because our Society has become a &#8220;giant&#8221; with a much, um&#8230; broader focus. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closing the loop &#124; Society Matters</title>
		<link>http://societymatters.org/2009/11/13/over-extended/comment-page-1/#comment-2433</link>
		<dc:creator>Closing the loop &#124; Society Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 17:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://societymatters.org/?p=3267#comment-2433</guid>
		<description>[...] Business Bureau.   • We&#8217;re silent when we should be speaking out.   • We&#8217;re selling our Brand equity over &amp; over again without a clear business plan for how we will replenish that equity.   • [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Business Bureau.   • We&#8217;re silent when we should be speaking out.   • We&#8217;re selling our Brand equity over &amp; over again without a clear business plan for how we will replenish that equity.   • [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

